Category Archives: Chuck Klein

Collection Report: Chuck Klein

At the risk of repeating information 2003 Gallery HOF KleinI’ve shared in the past, one of the many reasons for the Database Project (which is still ongoing and will be the subject of a post very soon) was my desire to quickly and easily get a report of every single card I owned of a particular player — as well knowing which cards of that player I didn’t own. While I continue to work on the database, I actually have entered all the cards in my collection into my personal version of the file. Currently, work on the database predominantly consists of adding new releases as they appear, formatting, and slowly combing through the most recent edition of SCD’s Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards and cross-referencing it against other sources of information to make sure I’m not missing anything.

This ongoing work, however, does not stop me from generating the type of reports I’ve been wanting to make. So, for the first time, here’s one such report. I decided to start with Hall of Famer Chuck Klein, for no other reason than I’ve previously posted only one of his cards to this blog. So without further ado, here’s how Klein is represented in my collection:

Solo cards: 321929 Kashin Klein
Multiplayer cards: 2 (both Phillies only)
Memorabilia cards: 5
Professionally graded cards: 4
Autograph cards: 0

Admittedly, this wasn’t a very interesting report. The few certified autograph cards issued thus far are cut autographs with miniscule print runs, and there’s no way I’ll manage to add any of them to my collection. The four graded cards represent the entirety of the cards I own that were issued during his playing days, and the possibility of acquiring additional ones from that period are somewhat remote, though I won’t rule it out. I’m ridiculously ambivalent about the fact that I have five Klein memorabilia cards — nothing has changed since my initial post about the subject of such cards for players whose careers ended decades ago. The closest thing there is to a Chuck Klein “want” on my list is probably his 1934-1936 Batter-Up card, which is almost certainly out of the range of what I can afford. Failing that, it would be nice to add his 1936 S and S Game (WG8) card to the collection, and it certainly isn’t too expensive. My favorite Klein card in my collection is easily the 1929 Kashin shown here. Nothing against the Goudeys and the other full-color cards of the ’30s, but in my eyes this is the nicest pre-War II Klein card made.

Future player reports likely will be more interesting. Please feel free to leave requests for future player collection reports in the comment section.

Advertisements

Collecting the 1940 Play Ball Set

Featured 1940 Play Ball Cards: #102, Chuck Klein; #217 Walter “Boom-Boom” Beck; #95, Hugh “Mul” Mulcahy; #160, John “Hans” Lobert

A few weeks back, I wrote briefly about how, out of necessity, I sold large parts of my pre-1970 collection nearly 10 years ago. As part of that sell-off, I liquidated nearly all of my collection predating World War II. As you can probably imagine, it was somewhat distressing, but I also knew that when my financial prospects improved again, that I could probably reacquire most of what I felt compelled to sell. Thankfully, for the past couple years I’ve been able to do just that, and in one notable case I am nearing my goal of once again completing the 1940 Play Ball team set I once possessed.

But first, a quick digression. As a result of the rise of the grading services, the overall complexion of my pre-World War II collection looks very different than it did 10 years ago. Admittedly, I could avoid graded cards should I wish to do so. However, as I’ve explained before, I buy the overwhelming majority of my vintage cards on eBay, and I view the graded product as a necessary evil. As a result, my nearly completed pursuit of the 1940 Play Ball Phillies resulted solely in mid-grade, PSA-graded cards. At this time, the only two cards I need to complete my set are Grover Cleveland Alexander and Joe Marty, and I have no desire to acquire them in anything other than PSA-graded form.

I made completing this team set a priority for a couple reasons. First and foremost, as I said before, I actually once possessed a complete team set 10 years ago. Secondly, it’s a relatively inexpensive team set to assemble. Yes, the Klein and Alexander cards are somewhat expensive, but obtaining mid-grade copies of their cards, even in professionally graded form, isn’t prohibitively so. And while the high numbers, cards 216-240, are also somewhat pricey, they cost less than many of the late ’40s through early ’50s Topps and Bowman cards (especially the high number cards) and are available in far greater abundance.

However, the most important reason I wanted to recompile this set is that I just absolutely love it. The primary reason is that so many of the player’s nicknames are placed in quotation marks, even though in most cases they’re unnecessary because that is how the player was known — it just feels quaint in a very cute way. And although it’s not considered a modern issue, in some ways 1940 Play Ball is incredibly similar to one. Its dimensions are fairly close to the today’s standard size, and the use of black and white photography nestled neatly in a designed border certainly presages the look of modern cards quite well.

There is actually one notable card in my 1940 Play Ball collection that is not PSA-graded, and that’s the John “Hans” Lobert Superman ad back variation. I didn’t even know about existence of this variation until Bob Lemke, former editor of SCD’s Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards, mentioned it on his blog this past October. To me, that revelation of this variation is just another example of one of the amazing thing about collecting baseball cards. There’s an archeological element to collecting in that decades after the hobby reached maturity, we still don’t know everything about all the cards that have been printed over the past 135+ years. More germane to this particular post, however, is how the variation is even in my collection today.

Back when I sold off my original team set, my copy of the Lobert card was one of the few pre-World War II cards to survive the purge. Although it was one of the first vintage cards I ever acquired as a teen, sentimentality had nothing to do with its remaining in my collection. No, the only thing that saved it was the fact that there was discoloration on the front of the card from pieces of cellophane tape that once upon the time secured the card on some sort of backing. When I was scanning cards and posting them to eBay in order to raise money, it just didn’t seem like doing so for this particular card would be worth the time and effort. So, for a few years it ended up being the only 1940 Play Ball card in my collection. After I started assembling a new team set, the very damage that allowed me to keep the card made it easy for me to purchase a graded version to replace it. Yet, I still didn’t do anything about trying to find a new home for it.

The card actually stayed in my pile of duplicates until just a few days ago. Although I read Lemke’s blog entry about the variation back when he posted it (I’ve been a regular reader of his site for some time), it wasn’t until I started planning my 1940 Play Ball checklist for the Phillies Database Project that it occurred to me to check my graded card and its tape-stained brethren to see if either of them were the variation. Given that his description of the variation stated that the Superman ad backs were much scarcer, I didn’t hold out much hope that I actually owned one. I was therefore stunned to find out that my tape stained copy — the equivalent of a bastard, red-headed step-child — was actually an uncatalogued part of my collection. It was an unexpectedly wonderful surprise.

So, I’m now faced with something of a dilemma. Although I know it would come back with deservedly low grade, I’m tempted to submit it to PSA just so that I can store/display it with the rest of its counterparts. For now, I hesitate to do so only because I’ve never submitted a card to a grading service before (or even properly researched how to about it). Regardless of whether I do or not, I find it amazing that I now consider an important part of my collection a card I held in such low esteem for most of the past 10 years.